1. In order to comply with Umalusi requirements, changes have been made to the way in which essay questions are marked in Section B of the Senior Certificate Business Economics Higher Grade examination paper.
2. These changes will be implemented in the marking of the Senior Certificate Business Studies Higher Grade paper as from November 2005. It is, therefore, essential that educators inform their candidates immediately of these changes and implement them in their September 2005 question papers and marking memoranda.
3. The mark allocation for the essay questions in Section B will be amended as follows:
3.1 The total number of marks allocated per question will remain 50 marks.
3.2 The marks allocated to content will be reduced to between 40 and 44 marks per question.
3.3 The remainder of the marks, i.e. between 6 and 10 marks, will be allocated to insight by making use of a rubric. The rubric for each question will be provided to the candidates, either in the question paper or in the answer book, so as to enable them to plan and structure their answers according to the assessment criteria.
3.4 The following generic rubric is an example of criteria which could be used when assessing insight:
CriteriaMarks
 0 marks1 marks2 marks
InterpretationHas misinterpreted the question completelyHas interpreted some aspects of the question correctly; answer not entirely suitableHas interpreted the question correctly and has drawn up a suitable response
ApplicationDoes not apply the information supplied by questionMakes some reference to the information provided in the questionIs able to apply the information provided in question
RelevanceAnswer not relevantHas drawn up an incomplete answer, and included some irrelevant informationHas selected and drawn up a complete answer; all relevant information is included.
OriginalityIs not able to provide examples from practiceProvided some suitable examples Provided suitable, original examples from practice
LayoutUnstructuredMade some attempt to structure the answer / dealt with some aspects of the questionProvided a suitable structure / dealt with all aspects of the question

3.5 The following serves as an example of a question and the way in answers would be assessed :

QUESTION

You are the credit manager of XXX Company. The company policy on the granting of credit will have to be revised to prevent bad debts. Make your recommendations to the rest of the management.

(Total: 50 marks     Content: 44 marks        Insight: 6 marks)

NOTE:

If a case study, in the form of an addendum, is provided so as to give the candidate more information on the situation presented in the question, the candidate is expected to apply that information in his or her answering of the question.

The content of the answer to the above question will, therefore, include the following:

Introduction: Setting the scene
Discussion:   Credit terms; determining creditworthiness; 
              conditions for granting credit; 
              duties of the credit department;
              and collecting overdue accounts.
Conclusion:   Possible effect on bad debts and profitability

The different sections of the answer will each be allocated a minimum and a maximum number of marks and so a candidate must ensure that he or she devotes the necessary attention to all sections of the answer.

The mark allocation could be as follows (if each fact counts 2 marks):

Credit terms                     Maximum 6 
Credit worthiness                Maximum 12 
Conditions for granting credit	 Maximum 12 
Duties of the credit department  Maximum 14 
Overdue accounts                 Maximum 12

The maximum number of marks awarded for factual information provided by a candidate would, in this instance, be 44 marks. A candidate would therefore only be able to attain full marks for the full question if all the sections have been discussed. (Refer to the rubric criterion: Layout)

The candidate’s mark for insight (maximum 6 marks in this case) would be determined using a rubric such as the following:


CriteriaMarks
 0 marks1 marks2 marks
InterpretationHas misinterpreted the question completelyHas interpreted some aspects of the question correctly; answer not entirely suitableHas interpreted the question correctly and has drawn up a suitable response
ApplicationDoes not apply the information supplied by questionMakes some reference to the information provided in the questionIs able to apply the information provided in question
LayoutUnstructuredMade some attempt to structure the answer / dealt with some aspects of the questionProvided a suitable structure / dealt with all aspects of the question

(NOTE: This rubric would be provided to the candidates either in the answer booklet or on the examination question paper.)

3.6 ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE MARKING OF SCRIPTS:

SECTION A

3.6.1 In this section the multiple-choice questions will be worth 3 marks each. Calculations required of candidates may be awarded a maximum of 4 marks per calculation.

SECTION B AND C

3.6.2 When a candidate is asked, for instance, to “identify and discuss” a specific topic from information provided from a case study, no marks will be awarded for an incorrect identification of the topic, even if some facts fit the incorrect identification.
3.6.3 Answers in these sections should always be in full sentences, unless a question specifically requests an answer provided in the form of a word or phrase.
3.6.4 In general, facts will count 2 marks each and candidates should be guided by the number of marks allocated to each question. One mark will be allocated for mentioning a fact, and 1 mark for contextualising or explaining it. However, if candidates are requested to “name and explain 5 characteristics” of a topic for 15 marks, 1 mark will be awarded for naming the characteristic and 2 marks for explaining it.
3.6.5 Where candidates are required to “discuss” a topic , 1 mark will be allocated for each heading and 2 marks for the content under each heading.
3.6.6 In general, candidates should be guided by the mark allocation when it comes to deciding how much to write.
3.6.7 Candidates should not answer more than the required number of questions. If they do, only the required number of questions will be marked. The rest will be ignored.
3.6.8 When the number of facts to be written down is stated, marking will continue only up to the point where the required number of facts has been reached. The remaining facts will be ignored

Principals are requested to ensure that this circular minute is brought to the attention of all concerned.

Further enquiries may be directed to the Business Economics curriculum advisers at each EMDC.



SIGNED: J.P. RAULT-SMITH
HEAD: EDUCATION
DATE: 2005:08:12